“I watched every second of the 90-minute match between Brentford and Chelsea, which ended in a 0-0 Disappointing game for Chelsea, and I must say these two Chelsea players do not deserve to continue their careers at the club

Sure, here’s the paraphrased version you asked for — everything reworded except the quoted parts:

—

**Search for**

**Home/Premier League**

**Football Premier League**

“I watched every second of the 90-minute match between Brentford and Chelsea,” a football analyst said, voicing strong criticism of two Chelsea players after the game finished 0-0. The analyst argued that these players no longer deserve to be part of the team.

Though the goalless draw produced no goals, it stirred debate — particularly around the poor showing of two Chelsea players. Their lack of influence during the match drew heavy criticism from an experienced analyst who felt their continued presence at the club was no longer justified.

The analyst shared their thoughts with frustration: “I watched every single minute of the full 90-minute encounter between Brentford and Chelsea.” They called the performance disappointing and lacking energy — especially from Chelsea. According to them, the match was a missed opportunity, one that demanded leadership and decisiveness which never showed up. Two key players in the Chelsea lineup, in particular, were blamed for failing to deliver when it counted. “They should not continue their careers at this club,” the analyst said firmly.

This performance wasn’t an exception in Chelsea’s season. Inconsistency has become a theme, and this match only emphasized their issues with structure, strategy, and finishing. Chelsea controlled the ball for much of the match and created a few chances, but couldn’t turn them into goals. This raised further doubts among fans and commentators about the motivation and dependability of certain players.

The analyst pointed to a veteran attacker and a midfielder once seen as a rising talent — both of whom have lost their connection to the rhythm and expectations of top-tier football. “These are not inexperienced players learning the ropes,” the analyst said. “These are supposed to be influential figures — athletes who should be driving the team forward, setting an example for younger teammates, and taking charge in difficult moments. But instead of leading, they shrink back. They blend into the background and have become the embodiment of the club’s decline in recent years.”

Their remarks didn’t stop there. The analyst also questioned the club’s ongoing trust in these individuals: “How many more opportunities will these individuals be given? How many more critical points will Chelsea lose simply because they keep placing their faith in players who have continuously underperformed? That match against Brentford should have been a wake-up call for everyone involved. If Chelsea truly wants to rebuild and become a serious title contender again, they need to make tough choices — beginning with parting ways with those who repeatedly fail to deliver.”

Fans seemed to echo this view. After the match, social media was full of criticism directed at the same two players, with many demanding they be dropped or sold during the summer window. Their continued role in the squad is now viewed as a hurdle to the club’s progress.

Chelsea’s current spot in mid-table — despite heavy spending in recent seasons — has only added to the scrutiny facing the board and coaching team. Despite all the investment, a consistent, unified squad has yet to emerge, and supporters are growing more frustrated.

In closing, the analyst delivered a sharp message: the time for leniency is over. No player is more important than the club, and if Chelsea wants to reclaim its place among Europe’s elite, tough calls are needed. Those who consistently fall short — regardless of name or past reputation — should be replaced by players ready to uphold the values and ambition the club has always stood for.

—

Let me know if you want this shortened, made into a headline piece, or adapted to another tone.